• Home
  • Background
    • Q&A: Why Stop Arms to Sudan?
    • Genocide Convention and Arms Sales
    • Arms Sales to Sudan, 2004-2006
    • Strengthening the Darfur Arms Embargo
    • U.S. Congress and Arms to Sudan
    • Resources
    • The Facts: China's Arms Sales to Sudan
    • Report on China's Relationship with Sudan
  • Take Action
  • Donate
  • Signup
  • Facebook


Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Two New Papers Focus Attention on China's Arms Sales to Sudan

Human Rights First has issued a new background paper outlining some of the implications of the charge by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court that Sudan President Omar al-Bashir has committed genocide. By publicly invoking genocide, the Prosecutor has focused the legal context for governing responses to the crisis on the Genocide Convention. Under the Genocide Convention, States’ are legally obligated to take all measures in their power to prevent and stop ongoing genocide. Countries such as China and Russia that arm Sudan and thus fuel the capacity of its government to sustain the alleged genocide campaign are bound by the Convention to take all possible action, including immediately suspending arms transfers. Sudan’s supporters may also be obligated to cease other kinds of support to Khartoum, such as political cover, and use their political or other influence to try to prevent or stop the potential genocide in Darfur.

The Prosecutor’s request for an arrest warrant against President Bashir informs States of the credible risk of genocide in Darfur, and thus triggers their obligation to act to prevent it or ensure they are not complicit in committing it. Last Thursday, the court survived the first major challenge to its efforts to bring President Bashir to justice, when the UN Security Council successfully resisted significant pressure by China, Russia, and others to include language that would have suspended the ICC proceedings within a resolution to extend the mandate for the joint U.N.-African Union peacekeeping mission in Darfur. The Security Council, which has frequently been stymied in its ability to intervene to stop the crisis in Darfur by permanent members Russia and China, has the authority to suspend the ICC deliberations on this matter for a year at a time if they are judged to endanger the promotion of peace and security.

You can read the background paper by clicking the link below:
ICC%20Charges%20in%20Darfur%20and%20the%20Gencoide%20Convention.pdf

The Arms and Security Initiative of the New America Foundation released a briefing paper today finding that China has been the "most egregious violator" of the Darfur arms embargo. The briefing paper aguments some of the findings in a report issued by Human Rights First in March that details China's economic, military and political relationship with the Government of Sudan.
Share This Post

posted by Eric Sears at 7:45 AM

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

signup for Human Rights First News

Previous Posts

  • President Bush: Tell China to Halt Arms to Sudan
  • UNAMID Renewal Negotiations in the Security Counci...
  • Kristof Takes Aim at China
  • Countries Shipping Arms to the Government of Sudan...
  • G8 Sends the Wrong Message to Sudan
  • G8 Leaders: Take action against arms in Darfur
  • China Says There's Nothing More It Can Do For Darf...
  • Over 40 Organizations Urge the G8 to Act on Darfur...
  • China to Sudan: Cooperate with Peacekeeping Missio...
  • U.S. Speaks Out Against China's Weapons Sales to S...

Related Links

  • Crimes Against Humanity
  • Human Rights First

Blog Roll

  • Lifeline for Iraqi Refugees Blog

  • End Torture Now Blog

  • Fundamentals Blog

  • Rights Wire Blog with the HRF Executive Director

  • Guantanamo Hearings

  • Refugee Protection Program

  • Prosecuting Terrorism

  • Stop Arms to Sudan
  • Business and Human Rights


Powered by Blogger

Subscribe to
Posts [Atom]